Kitab-i-Badi/English525: Difference between revisions

From Baha'i Writings Collaborative Translation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
God laughs at your words. It's as if the fragrance of God's pleasure has never passed over you, because today every breath that is attributed to the truth is surely a visible and visible effect of him. And God, your words seem inferior to the words of previous nations. Because God's hatred [280] was in your heart, your pen was forbidden and deprived of the gentleness of mentioning and writing. It is suspected that you have left Rahman's party and turned your attention to Satan's party. It is clear to anyone who can see that these worshipers, after five years of association, we mention what we have seen with our eyes and heard with our ears day and night. And you, according to the words of the evil one who was rejected by this servant, and clinging to the inhabitants of Aarash Ma'ani, even forbade yourself from the rays of the dawn of the meanings that are rising and falling in these merciful days.
The purpose of the polytheists has reached a point where some people like you have objected and have spoken and protested against the character of Jamal Rahman, and you have testified against the character and then protested for selfish reasons. Man is wondering which one of the sayings to confirm. On the one hand, the structure of corruption has written and complained about it, and it has stripped away the compassionate ethics from the manifestation of God. These words are written outside. On the other hand, he inspired you that he wrote to the tribes around the verse of this oath, if the morals are correct, what is the form of the denial of that people? If it is true, what does this mention mean? And Allah is sure that every seer has not said the right word and will not say it. According to the requirements of the time, whatever self-interest they consider to be malicious, they speak and reason about it.

Latest revision as of 16:34, 16 May 2023

The purpose of the polytheists has reached a point where some people like you have objected and have spoken and protested against the character of Jamal Rahman, and you have testified against the character and then protested for selfish reasons. Man is wondering which one of the sayings to confirm. On the one hand, the structure of corruption has written and complained about it, and it has stripped away the compassionate ethics from the manifestation of God. These words are written outside. On the other hand, he inspired you that he wrote to the tribes around the verse of this oath, if the morals are correct, what is the form of the denial of that people? If it is true, what does this mention mean? And Allah is sure that every seer has not said the right word and will not say it. According to the requirements of the time, whatever self-interest they consider to be malicious, they speak and reason about it.