Kitab-i-Badi/English505: Difference between revisions

From Baha'i Writings Collaborative Translation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
All the virtues of you and him are known from this one word. This servant is puzzled as to what he mentions in this position, what he uttered with the word that God and Pharaoh did not speak with such a word in front of Kalim. God alone is unique, if he is able to speak in front of a person from different sects, how far he can reach the source, the manifestation and the source of divine blessings! And now experience this promise! If the person who is present and the servant of the house is also present, if he can confront the servant in a dignified manner, I will tell you that we will not be honest with you. Despite the fact that saying too much is not and will not be a proof of your truth, because you are arguing against Allah with these fictitious proofs, so this servant in response to these words of Zakir Leila will leave me with an excuse, argument, proof, and reason. And except for the purest [269] of all these reasons, mentions, words, allusions, and symbols that you have tried to cling to, it was and will be sacred.
And again, inspired by that polytheist, Mulaqi wrote: Even more amazing is that they themselves claim that my expressions are verses, and their messengers say that their seven-year-old children also recite verses. So where will my verses of God's revelation be the proof of his authenticity, when his people also recite verses and their little son also recites verses? And if they say that the verse appears both from the position of creation and letters and from the origin of the dot and the genealogy of truth, then the essence of the verse will not be a proof of the authenticity of the origin of the genealogy, something else is necessary. Explain what it is.

Latest revision as of 16:28, 16 May 2023

And again, inspired by that polytheist, Mulaqi wrote: Even more amazing is that they themselves claim that my expressions are verses, and their messengers say that their seven-year-old children also recite verses. So where will my verses of God's revelation be the proof of his authenticity, when his people also recite verses and their little son also recites verses? And if they say that the verse appears both from the position of creation and letters and from the origin of the dot and the genealogy of truth, then the essence of the verse will not be a proof of the authenticity of the origin of the genealogy, something else is necessary. Explain what it is.